Speed

One of Imogen’s friends, who is also doing photography in sixth form, posted that she is saving for a camera. Specifically a Canon 5D. In keeping with the tradition of Canon/Nikon rivalry I considered posted that auto correct had changed ‘Nikon xxx’ to ‘Canon 5D’.

I set about researching equivalent models in the Nikon range. The nearest I found is the D800. The criteria I used to judge ‘similar’ were sensor size and price. But the more I read, the more I think that at this price point, Canon has the better camera.

The Nikon is cheaper and has a higher resolution (36Mp) sensor, so surely it’s the better camera? Well, maybe for some uses, but I feel it fails in two respects, both a direct result of going for a high pixel density.

Because the sensor elements are smaller they are less sensitive. The ISO equivalent range is therefore shorter than the Canon and at the high end noise becomes an issue. Second, because there are more pixels, the processing engine has to work with more data. This reduces the frame rate to 4 frames per second.

I then did some reading around the current Nikon DSLR range. I have a D300, the current incarnation of which is the D300S. It’s the only DX model (ACP size sensor) that Nikon have in their “professional” range. Professional seems to equate to similar electronics to the base FX model, but with a smaller sensor.

I continue to be very pleased with this camera. It’s capable of 6 frames per second, 8 with the external battery pack. Reading through the technical specifications of the current range the only camera that I’d consider replacing it with is the D4. This is unlikely to happen any time soon as it’s Nikon’s flagship model and costs around £4,300!

One thought on “Speed”

Comments are closed.